Connect with others across the political spectrum

Sign in / Sign up
Go to Homepage Go Back

Local Pittsburgh Issue

Is Pittsburgh's $21 million Second Avenue Commons #homeless shelter an appropriate use of taxpayer funds?

Second Avenue Commons, a new shelter to help Pittsburgh's homeless population, finished its construction in September of 2022. Citizens who already live in the area are divided in their beliefs about whether opening the shelter is a good decision.

One controversial aspect of Second Avenue Commons is that it will be Allegheny County's first "low-barrier" shelter, meaning residents will not be required to participate in sobriety programs. Michael Turk of Pittsburgh Mercy (the group which will operate the shelter) says, "our goal is always to meet people where they are, judgment-free." Though people staying at the shelter can not use controlled substances on the property, they will be provided with "amnesty lockers" to store their possessions securely. They will be allowed to keep alcohol and illegal drugs in these lockers if they choose.

Then-mayor Bill Peduto first approved $21 million in funding for the unique public-private partnership in August of 2020. The five-story, 45,000-square-foot building rests on land donated by the Urban Redevelopment Authority and the City of Pittsburgh. It will provide 95 beds year-round, plus an additional 40 during winter. The top two floors will provide 43 units of single-room occupancy housing for which residents will sign leases. The shelter will have shower and laundry facilities, lounge space, a library, and a computer room, which will be available to everyone whether or not they are staying at the facility. 

Supporters praise the facility as a step forward in helping provide necessities and services to the homeless to help them get back on their feet. For instance, it will provide them with a mailing address, which is usually required for employment or government assistance. This gives people a valuable opportunity to improve their situations in life.

Others are concerned that the facility will not encourage the homeless population to improve their circumstances. If their needs are thoroughly met by the new shelter, it may provide a disincentive to seeking employment and becoming more productive members of society. People are also worried about the potential safety ramifications of letting people stay at the shelter without participating in sobriety programs.

The question up for debate: Is Pittsburgh's $21 million Second Avenue Commons shelter an appropriate use of taxpayer funds?

Click appropriate box, you can then view all opinions

You support the "Yes" side

Will be able to score and add only
" Yes " opinions

Will be able to score and add only
" Yes " opinions

You support the "No" side

Will be able to score and add only
" No " opinions

Will be able to score and add only
" No " opinions

You don't support either side yet

Can add opinion for your eventual preferred side, but will not be able to score opinions

Can add opinion for your eventual preferred side, but will not be able to score opinions

This is a one-time only question for each issue