Enlargement of a new no-shooting zone by Snohomish County leaders is a blunt act made in haste, without considering any possible consequence. The liberty and freedom of action that the American Constitution accentuates is being criticized unfairly. Although there might be some chances of accidental damages, the situation in Snohomish county is not so critical that one should ban shooting categorically.

Authorities who ban shooting should be careful not to infringe on second amendment constitutional rights, “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms.” Recreational shooting is highly regulated by a plethora of state, county, local, and federal laws. Creating a no-shooting zone on a vast area may be counteractive. Instead, authorities should find a feasible solution. For example, most incidents occur during holidays. The council could be more vigilant in enforcing a safe distance for recreational shooters during this time.

There are many positive mental and physical health benefits of recreational shooting. For instance, this healthy activity builds physical discipline, enhances mental control, arouses a sense of personal responsibility, creates courage and confidence, and provides a sense of liberty. It is proven that such activities are big stress releasers, no matter how modest the stress level is. It is a high-profile economic activity that generates revenue for hundreds of people. Banning it outright will bring tougher days for the people associated with the industry. 

Though it might not look favorable, instead of banning shooting under the pretext of child safety, it is more important to realize that children and teens must learn about firearm safety and gun etiquette. By doing so, they will be more conscious, vigilant, and educated about guns and shooting and their safe usage.

Despite the fact that there has been tremendous population growth and development in the neighboring county of Monroe, banning recreational activities such as shooting is not a solution. A vibrant and effective urban planning is required to make the life in the city smooth and serene. The freedoms to choose a recreational activity that is suitable should remain.

It is the responsibility of the state to provide security to its people without detracting from their liberties. Banning the highly regulated shooting is an act of encroachment on the basic rights of the people. Therefore, the state must assure the safety and security of people along with ensuring the proper regulation of shooting, rather than banning it outright. Expansion of the no-shooting zone might not save lives, but will endanger the financial lives of many and curb the constitutional right of people.