Youth crimes remain a worldwide issue, and nations have differing opinions on handling such cases. The term “juvenile delinquent” refers to a young person below the age of 18 that commits crimes. When children break a state or federal law, they face different repercussions depending on the crime and jurisdiction.

Why do some children tend to commit crimes while others do not? Youths typically still lack the maturity and experience that adults have, so they are more prone to making mistakes and committing misdemeanors.

There are many reasons they break laws, with family background usually number one. Children learn from their parents and other family members, adopting their values. Often, offenders have been victims of violence committed by parents, siblings, and other relatives.

Community programs sound fine for petty crimes like theft or vandalism, but what if the law is too lenient, and the lack of severe consequences prompts those underaged people to commit more serious crimes like rape or murder? Is community service a fair sentence for someone who has put thought into assaulting, harming, or taking the life of another human being?

Yes, some people deserve second chances, but minors must be tried as adults when they commit serious adult crimes. Tougher measures should be given to tougher crimes.

Legislators should put themselves in the shoes of the victims and their families. Take, for instance, a case of a young girl raped and stabbed to death by 16- and 17-year-old boys. This is certainly a violent juvenile crime that deserves a serious penalty.

The issue is not about second chances but about making them accountable for their actions. Arkansas should focus on cracking down on youth crimes, especially serious ones. These people should be held responsible for their actions and not easily be allowed to return to the streets so they can victimize others.