Connect with others across the political spectrum

Sign in / Sign up
Go to Homepage Go Back

Local San Francisco Issue

Should the city of San Francisco charge a #congestionfee to decrease #traffic and raise money for #transportation?

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) has been considering the possibility of reducing rush-hour traffic by charging a “congestion pricing” fee to drivers entering specific districts, such as Downtown and South of Market, during peak hours.

They have created a tentative plan to charge drivers $6.50 to enter specific districts during peak hours, which they might implement when traffic returns to pre-pandemic levels. The charge would apply to people who earn more than $100,000 a year, and there would be partial or full exemptions for lower-income residents and those with disabilities.

The congestion pricing concept is nothing new. Similar programs have already been successfully implemented in many different places, and New York City plans to implement its own congestion pricing system soon. The concept is widely regarded as an effective way to reduce pollution while increasing safety for drivers and pedestrians. 

SFCTA originally planned to finish developing their policy by the end of 2021, but they put it on hold when traffic decreased significantly during pandemic lockdowns. Now that people are returning to the office and commuter traffic is on the rise, residents who earn more than $100,000 a year would have to pay a set amount in order to enter the downtown area. 

Supporters of congestion pricing believe that it will decrease traffic by encouraging people to stagger their working schedules. They say that revenue collected by the program could be used to fund any number of projects designed to enhance life in San Francisco, including additional transit service, street resurfacing, and bicycle/pedestrian improvements in the entire city... not only in the priced zones. 

Critics contend that congestion pricing would essentially penalize people for going to work. They say that it would make it prohibitively expensive for people to live and work in San Francisco. Retailers also fear that it would reduce overall sales by limiting the number of people who visit their stores, as well as limiting their willingness to spend money since they are already being charged for their visit.

The question up for debate: Should the city of San Francisco charge a congestion fee to decrease traffic and raise money for transportation?


Click appropriate box, you can then view all opinions

You support the "Yes" side

Will be able to score and add only
" Yes " opinions

Will be able to score and add only
" Yes " opinions

You support the "No" side

Will be able to score and add only
" No " opinions

Will be able to score and add only
" No " opinions

You don't support either side yet

Can add opinion for your eventual preferred side, but will not be able to score opinions

Can add opinion for your eventual preferred side, but will not be able to score opinions

This is a one-time only question for each issue