A recent study from the US Census Bureau, 2013-2017, showed that only 8.8% of the Maryland population prefers public transport, with the remainder using personal vehicles. Those who believe the budget needs to be directed towards mass transit point out massive issues regarding space, fuel consumption, and the environmental impact that shifting the focus from public transport can create. 

A single metro train can take hundreds of cars off the already congested streets, reducing air pollution and wear and tear on highways and streets. This can result in cleaner, safer roads while reducing the overall commute time for the average Marylander. 

On the other hand, many believe that a state's transportation system can only be as strong as the state of its roads and highways. Considering that most of the population prefers driving, it seems rational to prioritize road improvement with urgency. Additionally, road investment goes beyond just driving: cycle lanes and pedestrian sidewalks contribute directly towards the environment and residents' well-being. Stiffer roads and smoother pavements have been shown to significantly reduce fuel consumption and air emission by up to 4% every year, reducing carbon production by more than 2 million tons.

The question for debate is, should the Maryland transportation budget be invested in mass transit instead of improving older streets and highways?