Obesity is a growing concern in the United States, and one proposed solution is to implement a soda #tax. The idea is that, by increasing the price of sugary drinks, people will be less likely to consume them, leading to a decrease in obesity rates. This issue is a topic of debate, with opinions divided on whether or not a soda tax would be an effective way to address the problem.

Supporters of a soda tax believe that fiscal policies can promote healthier diets, and a 20% tax could lead to a reduction in consumption. They call for policies that reduce diet-related health risk factors, reduce the financial burden of non-communicable illnesses, and improve weight outcomes. Supporters point to  research that reveals taxes can greatly reduce the consumption of sugar—sweetened beverages such as Pepsi and Coca-Cola, sweetened tea and coffees, fruit juice, and energy and sports drinks. This is especially the case in low-income as well as diverse neighborhoods, places that suffer from the highest rates of diet-related chronic illnesses like obesity and diabetes.

Opponents of imposing a tax on soda argue that these "sin taxes" are regressive. Soda taxes disproportionately take more money from low-income taxpayers compared to high-income taxpayers. Also, opponents cite research that has generally indicated soda taxes are punitive, without the possibility to make a significant impact on the health issues in America. As stated in this Tax Foundation article, "They are a misguided attempt at solving a multifaceted health problem and will introduce many unintended fiscal consequences.”

The question for debate, Should there be a tax on soda to help address rising obesity rates?