The debate over whether transgender individuals (those who identify with a gender other than that of their sex assigned at birth) should be allowed to serve in the military has sparked contentious discussions across political and social landscapes. On one side of the spectrum stands former President Donald Trump, who instituted a ban on most transgender Americans joining the military during his tenure. On the other side stands Vice President Kamala Harris, who was part of the adminstration who swiftly overturned Trump's policy upon taking office, reinstating the opportunity for transgender individuals to serve.

Proponents of Trump's ban argue that allowing transgender individuals to serve could lead to logistical challenges and increased medical costs. They contend that maintaining military readiness and effectiveness requires adhering to strict standards and minimizing disruptions. Furthermore, they emphasize the need to prioritize the military's primary mission over accommodating diverse identities.

Conversely, supporters of Harris's decision assert that gender identity should not be a barrier to military service. They advocate for inclusivity and argue that transgender individuals are capable of meeting the same standards as their cisgender counterparts. Additionally, they highlight the importance of diversity within the military ranks, asserting that a more inclusive force strengthens national security and reflects the values of equality and fairness.

The question for debate is, should transgendered individuals be banned from serving in the military (Trump) or be allowed to serve (Harris)?