The controversial Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) of natural gas that stretches at the 303 miles horizon of West Virginia and southern Virginia poses questions of tradition and progress. The debate has arisen: should Virginia move toward renewable and clean energy technology or continue utilizing fossil-fuel-based energy? 

The MVP project will consist of a trail of steel pipelines throughout the natural landscape of Virginia and three compressor stations. There had been a massive support for the pipeline projects by the Former President Trump administration beginning in 2016.

The energy company estimates the pipeline project will bring employment opportunities to over 8,000 Virginians. Although various obstacles have surrounded the project since 2014, a year-long construction halt was reversed with permit restorations. Sources report that despite fines, violations, work delays, and protests, 51.32% of the pipeline route is complete. Although there is opposition from the public and environmental advocates, stakeholders believe that some economic benefits, such as the creation of jobs, increase in revenue, and tax generation, are some positive prospects that challenge the criticism.

However, the state of Virginia is vying for renewable electricity by 2050, and the construction of pipelines promoting fossil fuel-backed energy is a setback. The widespread protest by stakeholders such as Appalachian Trail Conservancy, Virginian Citizens, and landowners affected by the eminent domain ruling poses questions on the legitimacy of the company's claims regarding employment and raises environmental concerns. 

Since the pipeline's inception, the enterprise has faced multiple fines for environmental violations that resulted in stop-work orders. The company falsified claims that 92% of the project was completed, and sources concede that within Virginia, only 15% of the 108 miles long pipeline has been completed. 

Additionally, the MVP pipeline construction is taking place on some of the most dangerous and steep Virginian terrains, posing a risk of landslides and other safety hazards. Health, safety, and environmental issues are associated with this pipeline construction, such as air pollutant emission, a spike in greenhouse gases, contamination of natural waterways, and detriment to surrounding low-income communities.

The question for debate is, should Virginia ban all new pipeline construction?