The "war on poverty" initiated by President Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1960s remains a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. The policies and programs introduced during this era aimed to alleviate poverty and provide economic opportunities for all Americans. 

Supporters of LBJ's "war on poverty" policies argue that they have had a positive and lasting impact on American society. They contend that programs such as the Economic Opportunity Act, Medicaid, and food stamp initiatives have helped millions of Americans survive, including lifting many out of poverty. They highlight the decrease in poverty rates and improvements in access to healthcare and education as evidence of the success of these policies. Furthermore, proponents assert that the focus on empowering individuals and communities through job training and educational opportunities has contributed to upward mobility and economic growth.

However, critics of the "war on poverty" policies raise concerns about their efficacy. They argue that despite significant investments, poverty rates have not seen a substantial decline over the long term. Critics also point to unintended consequences, such as the potential disincentive for individuals to work due to the availability of government assistance. Some contend that the programs created a dependency on welfare rather than fostering self-sufficiency and upward mobility. Additionally, critics argue that the economic burden of these programs, coupled with their potential inefficiencies and bureaucratic complexities, hindered economic growth and contributed to the national debt.

The question for debate is, was LBJ’s “war on poverty” policies overall a success for America?