Hawaii, with its breathtaking landscapes and vibrant culture, has long been a top destination for travelers worldwide. However, the surge in tourism has led to concerns, impacting local communities and natural resources. In response, policymakers have proposed implementing a "green fee," a surcharge on tourists, to manage overtourism and promote sustainability.

Supporters of the "green fee" argue that it could be an effective tool to manage overtourism by controlling visitor numbers. The revenue generated from the fee could be invested in sustainable tourism initiatives, such as infrastructure development and conservation efforts. By regulating the influx of tourists, the fee could help protect Hawaii's delicate ecosystems and cultural heritage, ensuring that future generations can continue to enjoy the islands' natural beauty.

Critics of the "green fee" argue that it could have unintended consequences on Hawaii's tourism industry and local economy. Implementing an additional fee may deter some tourists from visiting the islands, leading to a decline in revenue for businesses that heavily rely on tourism. For many small-scale operators, the "green fee" could pose a significant financial burden, potentially leading to layoffs and business closures.

The question for debate is, would the "green fee" be an effective way to manage overtourism in Hawaii? #tourism