Totally overstepping boundaries here, this law's literally a green light for bias 

It's crucial to recognize that media bias can affect the portrayal of events, including crime rates. While it's possible that some conservative outlets may not highlight decreases in crime in liberal cities like Portland, it's important to seek information from a variety of sources to get a comprehensive view of the situation. It's also worth noting that media coverage can vary for a number of reasons, including editorial decisions, audience preferences, and the news cycle at any given time. Therefore, it's beneficial for individuals to research and verify information from multiple outlets to form a well-rounded understanding of current events.

Look, tossing around "conspiracy theorist clown" is just ad hominem. The media's got a bias, and we gotta question narratives, not parrot them. Trump's VP pick? Let's talk merit, not fear-monger. Let's debate policies, not sling mud.

I disagree with your perspective that police need more funding and training. Despite the challenges faced by marginalized communities, we should acknowledge the benefits of the "Defunding the Police" movement. Calling for reduced police funding aims to rethink the way we tackle crime prevention and public safety. It is not about abandoning law enforcement entirely, but adjusting priorities to invest in alternative solutions such as social programs and community resources that address the root causes of crime, instead of perpetuating a cycle of prosecution and punishment. Numerous studies indicate that pouring more money into police departments does not necessarily decrease crime rates. Putting resources towards education, mental health services, and poverty reduction initiatives has proven to be more effective in reducing crime and promoting public safety. Additionally, there is a growing recognition of systemic bias and racial profiling in policing that disproportionately affects BIPOC individuals. Funding and training alone won't solve these corrosive issues; rather, the root and lose eligibility factors, these systemic biases must be dismantled and replaced with equitable institutions. While certain challenges may arise during transition periods, liberal cities and communities can be seen as pioneers in progressive policing reform, as they actively seek alternatives to confront racially unfair practices. Rather than dismissing defunding as causing damage, we should seize this moment to introspect and facilitate change that ensures a fairer and more inclusive society for all members. Smarter allocation of resources has the potential to address the underlying sources of crime and public discontent, which significantly benefit marginalized communities in the long run.

The allegations against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his association with Republican megadonor Harlan Crow deserve a fair and thorough investigation, devoid of any preconceived bias or rush to judgment. Knee-jerk assumptions of wrongdoing threaten the very fabric of our justice system and undermine the belief in innocent until proven guilty. Disclosure of trips taken is one thing, painting it as shady without concrete evidence is just propagandizing. Justice Thomas deserves transparency but let us not cloud it with baseless accusations seeking to damage the credibility and integrity of a respected Judge.

Grow up, will ya? Your overzealous cheering for the punishment of those involved in the Capitol riot shows a lack of intellectual honesty. While I don't condone their actions, pointing fingers solely at right-wing ideologies while dismissing the act of peaceful protests on the left is a clear bias. How is it okay to lock people up for their political beliefs? That's what's really dangerous here, buddy. Laugh at us all you want, but for many conservatives, this was about something bigger than Trump. It's about questioning the fairness of the system and promoting freedom, even when politically incorrect. Save that self-righteousness for someone else.

It's concerning to see allegations of bribery being spread, but it's important to approach such claims with skepticism and critical thinking. The article you've shared is from the New York Post, a publication known to have a conservative bias. It's crucial to verify the credibility of the sources and examine multiple perspectives before drawing conclusions. The mainstream media scrutinizes politicians from both sides of the aisle, and any valid evidence of wrongdoing should be thoroughly investigated and reported on. Let's avoid jumping to conclusions without concrete evidence and allow due process to take its course.

MSNBC's close ties to former Biden spokespeople highlight the alarming level of bias in the mainstream liberal media. It's evident that the Biden administration is being actively supported and promoted by a network that should strive for independent journalism. This cozy relationship raises questions about the integrity of news reporting and the likelihood of fair and balanced coverage. Americans deserve a media landscape that is not beholden to political agendas and truly represents diverse perspectives.